Saturday, 31 October 2020

The best noise cancelling headphones under $100 https://ift.tt/31Zt69D

Sony WH-CH700N headphones on a cherry wood surface.

Credit: Lily Katz / Android Authority

Whether you have a loud commute or you want to work from home in peace, Noise-cancelling headphones are a must-have. The ability to just block out the world around you can be a key to concentration. However, the best headsets around often put a real hurting on your wallet. Luckily for you, there are some exceptions to the rule, and here are the best noise-cancelling headphones under $100 you can get.

While you won’t find the top headphones in the world on this list, these headphones offer a good mix of value and quality. You just might be surprised by what you can get for your money, so let’s dig in.

This list of the best cheap noise-cancelling headphones comes from the audio experts at our sister site SoundGuys. Check out their in-depth take on here.

Best noise-cancelling headphones under $100:

  1. Anker SoundCore Life Q20
  2. Sony WH-CH710N
  3. Sony MDRZX110NC
  4. JLab Audio Studio ANC
  5. Phiaton BT 100 NC

Editor’s note: We’ll make sure to update this list of the best cheap noise-cancelling headphones as new options launch.


1. Anker SoundCore Life Q20

A man wears the Anker Soundcore Life Q20 cheap noise cancelling Bluetooth headphones.

Credit: Anker

The SoundCore Life Q20 is the best option for most people as Anker continues to push the limits of budget-friendly audio. It strikes a great balance between power and value and comes in at nearly half of the $100 budget.

Although the noise-cancelling may not be up to the likes of Sony’s top-end WH-1000XM4, the Life Q20 is a force to be reckoned with in terms of comfort and battery life. The headset is light and it sports plush ear cups for long listening sessions. You can pretty much listen to your heart’s content too as Anker’s headphones boast 40 hours of battery life with ANC active.

Like most noise-cancelling headphones under $100, the Life Q20 is better suited to tune out conversations and basic background sounds than airplanes or lawnmowers. You generally get what you pay for, and the Life Q20 offers a consumer-friendly emphasis on bass.

Overall, the blend of ergonomic design, incredible battery life, and decent noise-cancelling is tough to beat. It gets even better once you remember just how affordable these cans can be.


2. Sony WH-CH710N

A picture of the Sony WH-CH710N on a green jacket.

As long as you don’t mind a refurbished headset, the Sony WH-CH700N offers $200 value in a sub-$100 package. We already know that Sony has been killing it with its top-end sets, but the WH-CH700N is a great alternative for you on-the-go listeners.

For starters, you won’t have to be nearly as worried as if you were toting $350 cans throughout your day. The headphones offer a tough plastic construction, rotating ear cups that flatten for storage, and enough comfort to listen for hours on end. They may be noise-cancelling headphones for under $100, but you can easily see the Sony flagship influence.

See also: The best Sony headphones you can buy

As for sound quality, the WH-CH710N delivers a neutral-leaning frequency response, though it’s not like that of the Life Q20. Instead of boosted bass, you’ll find an emphasis on vocals and stringed instruments. It’s great for you indie-rockers, but you may want to look elsewhere for EDM beats.

The WH-CH710N manages decent noise-cancelling if you’re puttering around your home office, though they really can’t compete with the best headsets. Both Bose’s Noise-Cancelling Headphones 700 and Sony’s own WH-1000XM4 pack bigger punches, but you can’t beat the value.


3. Sony MDRZX110NC

best noise cancelling headphones under 100 sony mdrzx110nc

Credit: Amazon

Surprise, surprise, Sony is right back on our list with a slightly different option — the MDRZX110NC. The name might be a mouthful, but these cans offer noise-cancelling for under $100 with an on-ear design. They may not be as effective as over-ear options, but it all comes down to your personal preference.

If you don’t want to spend time sitting around while your headphones recharge, the MDRZX110NC might be your best bet. They rely on AAA batteries to keep the tunes going, and you should be good for about 80 hours of power at a time. As long as you keep your battery drawer stocked, you might not have to worry about a charging cable ever again.

Sony’s MDRZX110NC are yet another pair of noise-cancelling headphones for commuters, and the 1.2-meter audio cable is a key accessory. It has an L-shaped 3.5mm gold tip that should last a good long time on your daily commute. Sony even includes an in-flight adapter with each pair so you won’t have to use those airline headphones ever again.


4. JLab Audio Studio ANC

best noise cancelling headphones under 100 jlab audio studio

Credit: Amazon

If you’re working with an even more limited budget, the JLab Audio Studio ANC is a perfect pick at around $60. It’s an easy way to test the noise-cancelling waters without putting your wallet through some pain.

The design isn’t our favorite on the list, as they’re not the most comfortable cans for long listening sessions. JLab Audio describes the ear cups as having “plush cloud foam cushions,” but they just didn’t work as well over time. On the other hand, the headphones keep the weight low and the minimalist aesthetic helps to redeem the overall look.

When it comes to noise-cancelling and overall sound, you get what you pay for from JLab Audio. As a result, it may not be your best pick if you fly often as you might still pick up some engine sounds.


5. Phiaton BT 100 NC

best noise cancelling headphones under 100 phiaton bt 100

Credit: Amazon

We’ve been leaning heavily on the headphones for our under $100 noise-cancelling list, but earbuds are worth consideration as well. There aren’t many options, but the Phiaton BT 100 NC gets the job done thanks to the behind-the-neck design.

See also: Best Bluetooth headphones

Thanks to that extra real estate, the Phiaton earbuds manage to pack a little extra punch in the form of NFC pairing, aptX codec support, and an IPX4 rating for water and sweat resistance. While the feature list sounds pretty good, it’s once again not perfect. You won’t get much in the way of battery life, and we found that the noise-cancelling was really not great. Worse yet, there aren’t too many alternatives to try at the same price point when your battery hits empty.


What you should know about the best noise-cancelling headphones under $100

A picture of the Sennheiser PXC 550-II worn by a woman reading on a porch.

Credit: Lily Katz / Android Authority

Noise-cancelling technology isn’t something you can really cheap out on. The world of consumer audio is full of products that push past the point of diminishing returns, but noise-cancelling tech isn’t one of those features.

It takes a lot of research and development to create an effective set of noise-cancelling headphones, and unfortunately, this means stretching your budget. These cheap ANC headphones are still perfectly fine for the price, but they can’t hold a candle to mid-tier options like the Jabra Elite 85h, let alone premium picks like the Shure Aonic 50.

Fit matters, a lot

To get the most out of any headphones, you have to take the time to get a proper fit. When wearing headphones this means that the ear cups must completely encircle the outer ear, without leaving any gaps between the ear pads and skull. A proper fit is very hard to achieve and maintain with on-ear headphones. If a pair of on-ears fits well on the head, it’s usually because of undue clamping force.

What is a Bluetooth codec?

Graph showing Android smartphone Bluetooth Codec Latency

Bluetooth codecs are important for any wireless headset; the Bluetooth codec is how your handset communicates with your Bluetooth headphones. Both devices need to support the same codecs in order to “talk.” By default, virtually all Bluetooth devices support the SBC codec, which is reliable but offers sub-0ptimal streaming quality. Android users should lookout for headphones with aptX or LDAC, while iPhone users need AAC for high-quality audio.

Why you should trust SoundGuys

SoundGuys is our sister site focused on all things relating to consumer audio. The team has a vast understanding of audio, and understands it to be an objective science while also respecting the importance of subjective experience and preference. SoundGuys cuts through the jargon in to lay the facts bare as they are, and make it easy for readers to understand what will and won’t work for them.



from Android Authority https://ift.tt/31YejMc

We asked, you told us: You’d buy the LG Wing if it was a bit cheaper https://ift.tt/2TIDspH

LG Wing gimbal camera mode

Credit: David Imel / Android Authority

There’s no denying that the LG Wing is a risky buy. Even in the world of foldable phones and clip-on screens, LG’s latest device is unlike any we’ve seen before. The practicality of its design is debatable, but it’ll likely appeal to first-adopters, collectors, and those who want something a little different.

One thing that may hold the Wing back is its price. At $999, you’re paying for the novelty as much as the phone’s smarts. And when put up against the OnePlus 8 Pro and Galaxy S20 Plus, the price perhaps doesn’t quite justify its party tricks.

In a recent poll, we asked readers if they felt this was indeed the case. Would they purchase the Wing if LG priced it a touch lower? Here’s what you told us.

Would you buy the LG Wing if it were more affordable?

Results

It’s true that any device would be more appealing at a lower price point, but some readers want the LG Wing’s price slashed by half.

A 42.6% portion of voters would purchase the Wing if it cost $500 instead of $999. These readers will be glad to know LG devices depreciate substantially over time, but it’s not yet apparent if this trend will affect its latest experimental phones.

Some readers didn’t ask for much of a price cut. 26.4% of readers say they’d purchase the Wing if it retailed for $700. This drop would bring it closer to the LG Velvet‘s $599 price tag. But at this price, it’s the same price as the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE and Pixel 5. These two devices would arguably be smarter investments if you’re willing to overlook their shortcomings.

Finally, 31% wouldn’t buy the LG Wing even if it were cheaper. It’s definitely a divisive form factor!

Here’s what you had to say

  • EspHack: There are no bad products, just bad prices.
  • Justbob: I’m amazed at all of the negative comments. It clearly doesn’t appeal to everyone. But the same glass slabs in a spec race has gotten boring. Hopefully LG continues to refine this idea, and hopefully it drives further innovation from LG and others.
  • Isaac YouTube: I’m gonna end up buying it on eBay eventually when it’s wicked cheap and have a cool phone for a fraction of the retail price
  • Dan Pan: I’d buy the Wing if it were available in Australia. Don’t need a price drop. There should be options to say you’re happy with the price or that you can’t buy it locally on the poll!
  • AnySmarterIdRunLinux: I’d buy the Wing if it didn’t rotate, had one ~6″ screen, a big battery (5000+ maH), and a headphone jack. In fact, I’ll buy the next phone that meets those specs.
  • meh…: Give us a hardware keyboard underneath, and I’m in.
  • KRB: I applaud LG for trying to be original, but I think they need to work on their software first. I’ve had LG phones and have had to help family members who have had LG phones, LG almost trips over themselves with their convoluted software compare to how straight forward it is on my Moto.

That’s it for our LG Wing price poll! Thanks to everyone who voted and commented. If you have any additional thoughts on the swiveling phone, its ideal price, or the results of this poll, drop them down below.



from Android Authority https://ift.tt/31ZUt3q

5 Android apps you shouldn’t miss this week – Android Apps Weekly https://ift.tt/3kG6ZMJ

AAW SideSqueeze screenshot
Welcome to the 352nd edition of Android Apps Weekly! Here are the big headlines from the last week:

Credit: Joe Hindy / Android Authority
  • Facebook is the latest company in the game streaming space. It wants to offer mobile game streaming through its official app and on the website. Some of the launch titles include Asphalt 9: Legends, WWE SuperCard, and PGA Golf Tour Shootout. The feature is currently rolling out regionally across the US and there are some restrictions as well. For instance, you need a good Internet connection in order to use it. More areas are coming soon as well as more games.
  • Netflix is potentially experimenting with an audio-only mode. XDA-Developers found evidence of such a mode in a recent APK teardown. It may seem silly since Netflix has a bunch of TV shows and movies. However, the service also has a bunch of comedy stand-ups and documentaries that might work pretty well in an audio-only mode. We’ll keep you updated if we hear more.
  • Google Play is testing out a comparison feature for apps. It’s only available for media players right now and lets you compare things like resolution support, whether or not it streams, and whether or not it works offline. It only works in version 22.4.28 of the Play Store and even if you have it, Google probably needs to flip a switch for you to see it. Hit the link to learn more details.
  • Sony revamped its PlayStation app just in time for the PS5 launch. The new version of the app includes a dedicated store, the ability to voice chat (similar to the Xbox app), and remote control capabilities for the upcoming PS5. You can also answer and send messages to other players, launch games, and manage your storage. It’s actually a fairly huge update and brings it more in line with Xbox’s already excellent mobile app.
  • Apple is likely working on a search engine to rival Google. It’s only a rumor, but one with a lot of steam behind it. Google is in the middle of an antitrust lawsuit with the US government and that may bode poorly for Apple. Additionally, it’s likely the company doesn’t want to rely on Google for its search functionality. In any case, you can hit the link to learn more about it.

Dragonscapes Adventure

Price: Free to play

Dragonscapes Adventure is a building simulator with a collector element. Players start on a remote island and build up their little ecosystem, collect various dragons, and merge dragons to make new dragons. It’s not the most exciting game ever, but you do get to explore your island a bit and see some stuff along with the game’s main mechanics. The dragons are cutesy and that appeals to some gamers. Additionally, the graphics are simple, but colorful so the game is pleasing to look at. It won’t blow your mind, but it should serve as a decent time waster.


Noobly

Price: Free

Noobly is a social app for gamers. You can browse profiles and see what other people play. From there, you invite them to play those games with you. It’s not promoted as a dating app although it probably could be for some people. In any case, it uses a Tinder-style flick mechanic as it shows you profiles. You swipe ones away that you don’t think you’ll like. You put things on your profile like interests, games you play, and other hobbies. It’s in early access beta, so there aren’t a ton of people on the service yet. If it pops off, it could be a good place for gamers to hang out.


Sumikkogurashi Farm

Price: Free to play

Sumikkogurashi Farm is easily the most difficult name to type in the history of Android Apps Weekly. This one is a farming simulator is similar in scope to games like FarmVille. You grow crops to earn money and XP, level yourself up, unlock more stuff, and grow more things. There is also a character customization element, monthly events, and some other small additions to the game to keep things interesting. It’s a relaxing game without a ton of player input, but a lot of players seem to enjoy the game’s simplicity. It’s a free to play game, but you don’t have to buy anything to enjoy yourself.

Sumikkogurashi Farm screenshot

Credit: Joe Hindy / Android Authority

SideSqueeze+

Price: Free / Up to $9.99

SideSqueeze+ is an app mostly for Samsung Galaxy phone owners. It gives devices the ability to squeeze-to-launch apps similar to the functionality we used to see on earlier Pixel and HTC devices. The app needs calibration, but it worked pretty well on our Galaxy Note 20 Ultra. The app doesn’t work on every device, but it found a home among Nexus 5 owners who miss older Pixel’s ability to squeeze to active Google Assistant. There are even S-Pen features if you want to try it with your Galaxy Note device. It is in early access, though, so expect some bugs, glitches, and compatibility issues here and there.

SideSqueeze screenshot

Credit: Joe Hindy / Android Authority

Spooky Wars

Price: Free to play

Spooky Wars is a hybird of several game genres, including tower defense, strategy, deck building, and dueling mechanics. Players can collect up to 50 cards with upgrades available to make them stronger. There are also three different game modes, social elements, leaderboards, and one versus one PvP. The game play is fine and reminiscent (but not identical to) games like Badlander Brawl. The only real downside is the game operated on a closed beta for a while and all of those players got to keep their game saves upon final release. Thus, day one players began the game at a serious disadvantage to the beta players. However, we expect that advantage to dissolve over time.


Thank you for reading! Check these out too:

If we missed any big Android apps or games news, updates, or releases, tell us about them in the comments!



from Android Authority https://ift.tt/2TFWJbt

DJI Pocket 2 review: Better than the original in so many ways https://ift.tt/3oKewN6

When the DJI Osmo Pocket launched in 2018, it quickly became one of my favorite gadgets. Its tiny size and powerful features make it an essential part of my gear bag. It allows me to get high-quality, ultra-smooth video with the same camera sensor found on a prosumer DJI drone.

Needless to say, I was super excited to get my hands on the follow-up for this DJI Pocket 2 review. DJI made a lot of substantial upgrades to the Pocket 2 compared to the original, and I couldn’t wait to put them to the test.

About this DJI Pocket 2 review: I used the Pocket 2 on its own as well as in tandem with my OnePlus 7 Pro. I used it with a beta version of the DJI Mimo app for Android. DJI provided Android Authority with the device and the beta app for the purposes of this review.
DJI Pocket 2 A tiny all-in-one camera solution
The DJI Pocket 2 features the same three-axis gimbal camera you find on DJI's line of prosumer drones. As such, you can expect high-quality, super-smooth videography from a tiny hand-held device.

DJI Pocket 2 review: What is it?

DJI Pocket 2 Review in hand for selfie mode

Credit: C. Scott Brown / Android Authority

The DJI Pocket 2, like the original Osmo Pocket, is an all-in-one three-axis gimbal camera. The permanently-attached camera sensor on top of the device is incredibly similar to what you’d find on DJI’s line of market-leading drones, such as those in the Mavic series.

Because it has three-axis motorized stabilization, you can capture buttery smooth video footage. Whether you’re walking, running, hiking, or just using a selfie stick, you won’t see many shakes or wobbles while you record.

Related: The best smartphone gimbals you can get right now

DJI also has a line of smartphone gimbals, the newest of which is the DJI OM 4. This achieves similar results as the Pocket 2 but uses your smartphone for video capturing. The advantage with that setup is that your smartphone’s multiple cameras might be better for your needs than the Pocket 2’s setup. However, the primary disadvantage is that a smartphone gimbal will take up quite a bit of space in your bag. The Pocket 2, on the other hand, will literally fit in your pocket.

What’s new since the DJI Osmo Pocket?

DJI Pocket 2 Review next to DJI Osmo Pocket

Credit: C. Scott Brown / Android Authority

DJI crammed a ton of new features into the DJI Pocket 2. Not only did it upgrade some of the internal specs — including the all-important camera sensor — but it also added new hardware elements. There are also more accessories included with the base-level package.

Below, you’ll find a table with the major differences between the DJI Pocket 2 and the 2018 model. Please note that these are not all the differences, just the major ones.

  DJI Pocket 2 DJI Osmo Pocket
Camera 1/1.7” CMOS
Effective pixels: 64 MP
Max image: 9,216 x 6,912
1/2.3” CMOS
Effective pixels: 12 MP
Max image: 4,000 x 3,000
Lens 93-degree FoV
ƒ/1.8
Format equivalent: 20mm
80-degree FoV
ƒ/2.0
Format equivalent: 26mm
HDR Support Coming soon:

2.7K: 2,720×1,530
24/25/30fps

FHD: 1,920×1,080
24/25/30fps
Not supported
Slow motion 1080p/120fps (for 4x)
1080p/240fps (for 8x)
1080p/120fps (for 4x)
Digital zoom 4x at 1080p
3x at 2.7K
2x at 4K
Not supported
Livestreaming YouTube
Facebook
RTMP

(Requires accessory)
Not supported
Audio Quad-mic array Dual-mics
Quick-start button Yes, on side of device Not supported
Dimensions and weight 124.7 x 38.1 x 30mm
117g
121.9 x 36.9 x 28.6mm
116g
In-box contents Gimbal
Case 2.0
USB-C connector
Lightning connector
USB-C cable
Wrist strap
Tripod mount adapter
Control stick adapter
Gimbal
Case
USB-C connector
Lightning connector
USB-C cable
Wrist strap

Who is this device for?

DJI Pocket 2 Review In filming mode in hand

Credit: C. Scott Brown / Android Authority

As with the original Osmo Pocket, the DJI Pocket 2 is primarily geared towards vloggers and other content creators. For novices, the Pocket 2 could be the only gear you need to get started on YouTube. It has a huge camera sensor and a versatile set of features. It’s easy enough for anyone to use, and, of course, is incredibly small.

Related: The best cameras for beginners

The Pocket 2 is not going to replace a DSLR or mirrorless camera for professional videographers who already have tons of gear. However, its tiny size makes it ideal for travel vlogging or for outdoor activities such as hiking. Basically, any shoot in which lugging a huge gear bag would be impractical is ideal for the Pocket 2.

Outside of content creation, the DJI Pocket 2 could also be great for people who simply enjoy filming their day-to-day lives. If you love recording videos of your kids, for example, this device could get you better results than what’s possible with your smartphone camera.

DJI Pocket 2 review: How to use it

DJI Pocket 2 Review next to carrying case

Credit: C. Scott Brown / Android Authority

There are two basic ways to use the DJI Pocket 2: on its own or in tandem with a smartphone. Almost all the features of the device can be accessed without using a smartphone.

However, take care to note that you must perform an initial setup procedure using the DJI Mimo smartphone app. This is not optional and cannot be done with a computer. When you take the Pocket 2 out of the box, it will only work on its own five times before it stops functioning. Physically attaching it to an iPhone or Android phone equipped with a USB-C port is the only way to continue use. Once registered, you can use the Pocket 2 without a smartphone as much as you wish.

DJI Pocket 2 on its own

DJI Pocket 2 Review Format Selection

Credit: C. Scott Brown / Android Authority

With the original Osmo Pocket, you would start it up by holding down the multi-function button (MFB). The DJI logo would appear on the 1-inch display while it loads and then the gimbal would be ready.

With the Pocket 2, there’s a brand new button on the side that allows you to perform a quick-start. You hold down this button for a second, and then the screen lights up. The gimbal aligns itself and you are instantly ready to record.

DJI Pocket 2 Review Settings DJI Pocket 2 Review Gimbal Settings DJI Pocket 2 Review Video Settings

With the Pocket 2 on its own, you can see what you are recording on the touchscreen display. Using swipes and taps, you can change settings, enter different recording modes, view what you’ve recorded, etc. You can access and tweak nearly all the features of the Pocket 2 from here — no smartphone required.

DJI Pocket 2 with a smartphone

Inside the box, you’ll find three adapters for the Pocket 2: a Lightning adapter for iPhones, a USB-C adapter for Android phones, and a control stick adapter. You can only use one of these adapters at a time, but they are hot-swappable.

With the appropriate adapter connected to the Pocket 2, you can then attach the two together. Check out the photos in this article to see how it looks.

With the two connected, your phone should automatically launch the DJI Mimo app. Once configured, you can use your phone as a viewfinder, which is a huge upgrade over the 1-inch display of the Pocket 2 itself. You can also enter a few modes that the Pocket 2 can’t perform on its own.

DJI Pocket 2 Review Attached to Android phone camera mode

Credit: C. Scott Brown / Android Authority

The two biggest modes exclusive to smartphone usage are Story Mode and Livestream Mode. Story Mode is one of DJI’s most popular features. It allows you to create a quick-cut compilation of short clips set to music. You can then share your Story on social media. Check out an example below. The whole thing took about three minutes total: a minute to film, a minute for Mimo to create the edit, and then a minute to share.

The other major smartphone-exclusive feature of the Pocket 2 is Livestream Mode. This is something that is unavailable on the original Osmo Pocket. With the Pocket 2 attached to your phone, you can live stream to YouTube, Facebook, or RTMP. However, for this to work you must use the Do-It-All Handle accessory ($99), which doesn’t come with the Pocket 2. You’ll need to buy that separately or get the Creator Combo variant of the device.

For this DJI Pocket 2 review, DJI did not send us the Creator Combo. Therefore, we were unable to test out Livestream Mode. This is regrettable, and it’s also unclear why you need the Do-It-All Handle for this to work in the first place.

What’s it like to use the Pocket 2?

DJI Pocket 2 Review with controller adapter removed

Credit: C. Scott Brown / Android Authority

Since I have been using the original Osmo Pocket for almost two years now, the DJI Pocket 2 feels incredibly intuitive. In brief, there are no major differences in how the two versions operate. However, newcomers might need some insight into what it’s like.

Using the Pocket 2 on its own is super simple. You power it on with the new quick-start button, hit record, and boom: you’re filming super-steady video footage. I would feel comfortable giving one of these to my dad, who is pushing 70 and not super tech-savvy. That’s how easy it is.

The DJI Pocket 2 is simple enough that my dad could use it.

Navigating through the touchscreen interface of the device, you can make a whole slew of changes:

  • Swap between video and photo modes
  • Alter video/photo quality
  • Create timelapse, hyperlapse, and motionlapse videos
  • Film in slow-motion

You can also perform shortcuts using various buttons:

  • One tap of MFB: Switch between photo and video mode
  • Two taps of MFB: Re-center gimbal
  • Three taps of MFB: Flip camera to face towards (selfie) or away from you

If you take off the smartphone adapter and attach the new controller adapter, you can physically control the camera in two different ways. In one mode, you can control the pan and tilt of the gimbal. In the other, you can control digital zoom — a new feature unavailable on the original Osmo Pocket.

Finally, DJI offers a slew of accessories for the Pocket 2 that will enhance your experience. Many of these come with the Creator Combo, such as a wireless microphone, a wide-angle lens attachment, and a mini tripod. You can also buy most of these accessories separately.

Alternatives to the DJI Pocket 2

DJI Pocket 2 Review in case with DJI Osmo Pocket

Credit: C. Scott Brown / Android Authority

The most obvious alternative to the DJI Pocket 2 is the original Osmo Pocket. You’re going to lose out on quite a few specs and features if you go this route (see the table further up for all the differences). Interestingly, you’re not going to save any money by getting the older Pocket either. The base-level package is the same for both products. In that sense, the Pocket 2 is a no-brainer.

However, if you already own the Osmo Pocket, it might not be worth upgrading to this. You’re going to gain digital zoom, a better camera sensor, and better audio with the new quad-mic array, but that might not be worth the money.

Related: Smartphone tripods: Everything you need to know

If you want to go a completely different route, you could always get a GoPro. While it doesn’t have the same form factor, it also offers a pocket-sized case, ease-of-use, mechanical stabilization, smartphone integration, etc. In my opinion, though, the Pocket 2 is much more versatile than a GoPro.

Finally, you could save a bunch of cash and buy a smartphone gimbal. For around $150, you can get a high-quality three-axis gimbal and just use your smartphone for all the video capture. If you do this, though, you’ll lose out on the pocketable form factor.

What I like about the DJI Pocket 2

  • Upgrades feel meaningful: The various specs and hardware tweaks DJI made here are terrific. The Pocket 2 is genuinely better than the original. The fact that it’s the same price is the icing on the cake.
  • The new controller adapter is useful: When using the Pocket 2 without a smartphone, you can use a hardware controller adapter. Although tiny, it makes zooming/panning/tilting much easier. You can easily change what the stick controls right from the gimbal’s settings.
  • Better audio: The new quad-mic array makes audio recording much better. Now, no matter what you are filming, there’s a mic facing the subject. This is leaps ahead of the rear-facing and downward-facing mics of the Osmo Pocket.
  • The new case is genius: The new case that comes with the Pocket 2 allows you to keep everything included with the gimbal either inside it or attached to it. That includes everything in the Creator Combo, too.

What I dislike about the DJI Pocket 2

  • Some star features disabled or inaccessible: At some point in the future, the Pocket 2 will support HDR video. However, this was not active on our review unit and DJI wouldn’t say when it would land. Additionally, you can’t use Livestream Mode without a $99 accessory. Bad form, DJI.
  • Autofocus could be better: During my time testing the DJI Pocket 2, I noticed that autofocus wasn’t always solid. It wasn’t bad at all but definitely could see some improvement. It’s possible a software update would make this better.
  • Some Osmo Pocket accessories won’t work: If you already own an Osmo Pocket and invested in accessories for it, they won’t work with this. The only exception are the ND filters. DJI-branded and most third-party ND filter attachments work on the Osmo Pocket and Pocket 2.
  • Battery life is the same: This is a bit nit-picky, but the battery capacity is the same across both the Osmo Pocket and the Pocket 2. This makes it so battery life isn’t any better this year. Granted, the sheer size of the device makes this tricky, but it’s unfortunate DJI couldn’t find a way to fit in a bigger battery.
  • Still no speaker: You can watch videos you’ve recorded back on the Pocket 2, but you won’t be able to hear any sound. That’s because there’s no speaker and no headphone jack. The Do-It-All Handle has both, marking yet another reason why the Creator Combo is pretty much essential for true value with this product.

DJI Pocket 2 review: The value and the verdict

DJI Pocket 2 Review attached to Android phone back

Credit: C. Scott Brown / Android Authority

As much as I loved the DJI Osmo Pocket, the Pocket 2 is far better. DJI took everything I loved about the original and either improved it or simply left it alone. The idea that you’ll pay the same for this as you did for the Osmo Pocket in 2018 is wonderful.

However, the ultimate question is whether or not current Osmo Pocket owners should upgrade. While the video and audio quality are going to be better on the Pocket 2, it isn’t so much better that an upgrade would truly be worth it. Aside from digital zoom and HDR recording (coming at some point in the future), there’s nothing you can do with the Pocket 2 that you can’t do with the Osmo Pocket.

DJI Pocket 2 A tiny all-in-one camera solution
The DJI Pocket 2 features the same three-axis gimbal camera you find on DJI's line of prosumer drones. As such, you can expect high-quality, super-smooth videography from a tiny hand-held device.

That being said, if you are interested in upgrading, it would be unwise to go with the $349 base package. I would recommend spending the extra money and buying the $499 Creator Combo. The Do-It-All Handle alone is worth it. It introduces a 3.5mm jack, a wireless connection between the Pocket 2 and your phone, and enables Livestream Mode.

The DJI Pocket 2 is much easier to recommend if you don’t own an Osmo Pocket, however. If this is a product that interests you at all, you can’t go wrong with either package.


That’s a wrap on our DJI Pocket 2 review. What do you think of the second generation of the innovative pocket gimbal camera?



from Android Authority https://ift.tt/34K1AyM